Making Data Visible in Public Space
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
“Transparency” is continually set as a core value for cities as they digitalize. Global initiatives and regulations claim that transparency will be key to making smart cities ethical. Unfortunately, how exactly to achieve a transparent city is quite opaque. Current regulations often only mandate that information be made accessible in the case of personal data collection. While such standards might encourage anonymization techniques, they do not enforce that publicly collected data be made publicly visible or an issue of public concern. This paper covers three main needs for data transparency in public space. The first, why data visibility is important, sets the stage for why transparency cannot solely be based on personal as opposed to anonymous data collection as well as what counts as making data transparent. The second concern, how to make data visible onsite, addresses the issue of how to create public space that communicates its sensing capabilities without overwhelming the public. The final section, what regulations are necessary for data visibility, argues that for a transparent public space government needs to step in to regulate contextual open data sharing, data registries, signage, and data literacy education.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Works are licensed under Creative Commons license “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).”
This license permits readers to share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms: Attribution — one must give appropriate credit, and provide a link to the license. Non Commercial — one may not use the material for commercial purposes. NoDerivatives — If one remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, one may not distribute the modified material.
References
‘The 6 principles of our manifesto’ (TADA) <https://tada.city/en/home-en/> accessed 4 May 2021
‘Declaration of Cities Coalition for Digital Rights’ (Cities for Digital Rights) <https://citiesfordigitalrights.org/declaration> accessed 4 May 2021;
‘Here you will find cities that already joined the initiative to protect, promote and monitor residents' and visitors' digital rights.’ (Cities for Digital Rights) <https://citiesfordigitalrights.org/cities> accessed 6 May 2021.
(DTPR) <https://dtpr.helpfulplaces.com/> accessed 21 April 2021.
Dan Simmons ‘12 Countries with GDPR-like Data Privacy Laws’ (Comforte, 12 January 2021) <https://insights.comforte.com/12-countries-with-gdpr-like-data-privacy-laws> accessed 4 May 2021.
‘Inspraak Verordening meldingsplicht sensoren’ (Gemeente Amsterdam, 24 February 2021). <https://bekendmakingen.amsterdam.nl/bekendmakingen/publicatie/inspraak/inspraak-sensoren/> accessed 7 May 2021.
General Data Protection Regulation [2016] OJ L 119.
Meeri Haataja, Linda van de Fliert and Pasi Rautio, ‘Public AI Registers’ (White Paper, 2020) <https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5c8abedb10ed656ecfb65fd9/5f6f334b49d5444079726a79_AI%20Registers%20-%20White%20paper%201.0.pdf> accessed 7 May 2021.
City of Amsterdam Algorithm Register Beta (Gemeente Amsterdam)
<https://algoritmeregister.amsterdam.nl/> accessed 4 May 2021;
City of Helsinki AI Register (Helsinki) <https://ai.hel.fi/en/ai-register/> accessed 4 May 2021.
Klaus Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution (1st edn, World Economic Forum 2016) 73 <https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/3385454/Schwab-The_Fourth_Industrial_Revolution_Klaus_S.pdf>.
‘Digital Twin voor stedenbouw’ (6 December 2019) <https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/71cd7ef2f092419ca1f02415e35d7d2f> accessed 4 May 2021.
Renata Paola Dameri, Smart city: How to create public and economic value with high technology in urban space (Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux eds, CH Comparing smart and digital city: Initiatives and Strategies in Amsterdam and Genoa. Are they digital and/or smart?, Springer International Publishing 2014) 45.
Michael Patrick Lynch, The Internet of Us (W.W. Norton, Liveright Publishing Corporation 2016).
Cass R. Sunstein. “Nudging: A Very Short Guide” [2014] 37 J. Consumer Pol'y 583.
Image skeletonized data, edited. Kean Walmsley, ‘Realtime visualization of sensor data from the MX3D bridge’ (24 October 2018) <https://www.keanw.com/2018/10/realtime-visualization-of-sensor-data-from-the-mx3d-bridge.html> accessed 5 May 2021.
Riley, Jonathan. ‘Utilitarian Ethics and Democratic Government.’ (1990) 100(2) Ethics 335. JSTOR accessed 15 Apr. 2021.
Michelle Cayford & Wolter Pieters ‘The effectiveness of surveillance technology: What intelligence officials are saying’ (2018) 34(2) The Information Society 88, DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2017.1414721.
Kevin Fu and others, ‘Safety, Security, and Privacy Threats Posed by Accelerating Trends in the Internet of Things.’ (White Paper, 2017) <http://cra.org/ccc/resources/ccc-led-whitepapers/> accessed 7 May 2021.
Kirstie Ball (2009) EXPOSURE, Information, Communication & Society, 12:5, 639-657, DOI: 10.1080/13691180802270386 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13691180802270386.
Privacywaakhond legt Enschede boete op van 600.000 euro vanwege wifitracking (NOS, 29 April 2021) <https://nos.nl/artikel/2378665-privacywaakhond-legt-enschede-boete-op-van-600-000-euro-vanwege-wifitracking> accessed 5 May 2021.
Cammers-Goodwin, Sage. (Forthcoming 2021). Revisiting Smartness in the Smart City. In S. Vallor (ED.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology. Oxford University Press.
Shazade Jameson, Christine Richter & Linnet Taylor (2019) People’s strategies for perceived surveillance in Amsterdam Smart City, Urban Geography, 40:10, 1467-1484, DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2019.1614369.
David Beer (2017) The social power of algorithms, Information, Communication & Society, 20:1, 1-13, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147.
Maurits Martijn, Dimitri Tokmetzis, Je hebt wél iets te verbergen (5th edn, De Correspondent Uitgevers 2018).
Hanbyul Choi, Jonghwa Park, Yoonhyuk Jung, ‘The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior’ (2017) 81 Computers in Human Behavior 42.
‘People, Power and Technology’ (Doteveryone, 2018) <https://doteveryone.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/People-Power-and-Technology-Doteveryone-Digital-Attitudes-Report-2018.compressed.pdf> accessed 5 May 2021.
Ken Anderson and others, ‘A.I. Among us’ [2019] Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings 38.
Miranda Mourby, Heather Gowans, Stergios Aidinlis, Hannah Smith, Jane Kaye, Governance of academic research data under the GDPR—lessons from the UK, International Data Privacy Law, Volume 9, Issue 3, August 2019, Pages 192–206, https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz010.
Sage Cammers-Goodwin, Michael Nagenborg, ‘From Footsteps to Data to Art: Seeing (through) a Bridge’ (2020) special volume 8 Contemporary Aesthetics <https://contempaesthetics.org/2020/07/16/from-footsteps-to-data-to-art-seeing-through-a-bridge/> accessed 6 May 2021.
University of Chicago, ‘AoT is now an anchor partner in a new NSF-funded project called SAGE.’ (Array of things, 2020) <https://arrayofthings.github.io/> accessed 21 April 2021.
Array of Things, ‘Five years, 100 nodes, and more to come‘ (Medium, 31 May 2018) <https://medium.com/array-of-things/five-years-100-nodes-and-more-to-come-d3802653db9f> accessed 21 April 2021.
Sentilo BCN (Ajuntament de Barcelona) <http://connecta.bcn.cat/connecta-catalog-web/component/map> accessed 21 April 2021; Sensors Crowd Monitoring System Amsterdam’ (City of Amsterdam) <https://maps.amsterdam.nl/cmsa/?LANG=en> accessed 21 April 2021.
Amsterdam does have some datasets open to the public which are not connected to their sensor map: Datasets (Gemeente Amsterdam) <https://data.amsterdam.nl/datasets/zoek/> accessed
‘Inspraak Verordening meldingsplicht sensoren’ (Gemeente Amsterdam, 24 February 2021) <https://bekendmakingen.amsterdam.nl/bekendmakingen/publicatie/inspraak/inspraak-sensoren/> accessed 23 June 2021.
Jacqueline Lu, Chelsey Colbert, Patrick Keenan, ‘How can we bring transparency to urban tech? These icons are a first step.’ (Sidewalk Labs, 19 April 2019) <https://www.sidewalklabs.com/blog/how-can-we-bring-transparency-to-urban-tech-these-icons-are-a-first-step> accessed 21 April 2021.
‘Digital transparency in the public realm’ (City of Boston, 8 October 2020) <https://www.boston.gov/departments/new-urban-mechanics/digital-transparency-public-realm> accessed 21 April 2021.
Naomi van Stralen, ‘A Smarter Bridge’ (Bachelor thesis, University of Twente 2020).
United Nations Publications, ‘Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals’ (1968).
‘50 years on, the 1968 Conventions on Road Traffic and Road Signs and Signals are still at the core of road safety efforts worldwide’ (UNECE, 7 November 2018) <https://unece.org/transport/press/50-years-1968-conventions-road-traffic-and-road-signs-and-signals-are-still-core> accessed 1 May 2021
Raymond Loewy, Never Leave Well Enough Alone (1st end, The Johns Hopkins University Press 1951).
Sean Adams, The Designer’s Dictionary of Colour (Abrams, 2017).