Performing an Anti-Homeless City A Legal Geography Analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the time of globalization, many cities, including the city of Victoria in BC, have engaged in a development model fueled by investment, tourism, and economic immigration. This model requires public authorities to implement policies that contribute to making cities worthy of capital, tourists, and immigrants. Digital connectivity, real estate development, local amenities, and revitalized neighbourhoods are essential ingredients for economic development. In contrast, poverty and urban decay are not good for the way of life that politicians, entrepreneurs, tourists, and urbanites desire. Therefore, all visual manifestations of urban decay, including homelessness, should be restricted by law. In response to this development model, homeless people are forced to perform actions that are banned like building tent cities in parks. In doing so, homeless people challenge exclusionary legal and spatial orderings that support anti-homeless cities.
This paper develops a performativity-based approach to legal geography to contribute to the debate about homelessness in Canada. Rather than focusing on the social right to housing, my argument in this paper zeroes in on the right to use urban space without being excluded. To this goal, I explore interactions between local authorities, homeless people, and other social actors in Victoria to explain that reiterated human interaction is the means to perform and rectify legal and spatial orderings that segregate homeless people. Thus, the performativity-based approach to legal geography developed throughout this paper illustrates not only how anti-homeless cities are socially performed, but also how they are collectively contested.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Works are licensed under Creative Commons license “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).”
This license permits readers to share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms: Attribution — one must give appropriate credit, and provide a link to the license. Non Commercial — one may not use the material for commercial purposes. NoDerivatives — If one remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, one may not distribute the modified material.
References
Plutarch, Plutarch's Lives, in Six Volumes: Translated from the Greek. with Notes, Explanatory and Critical, from Dacier and Others. to which is Prefix'd the Life of Plutarch, Written by Dryden, vol. 4, Alexander (J. Williams 1769) <http://find.gale.com.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/ecco/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=ECCO&userGroupName=uvictoria&tabID=T001&docId=CB128064825&type=multipage&contentSet=ECCOArticles&version=1.0&docLevel=FASCIMILE> 240 accessed 16 December 2020.
16. P.R Bosman, ’King meets dog: the origin of the meeting between Alexander and Diogenes’ [2007] 50 Acta Classica accessed 16 December 2020.
Kendra Milne, ‘Municipal regulation of public spaces: effects on section 7 Charter Rights’ [2006] 11 Appeal 1.
Scott McAlpine, ‘More than wishful thinking: recent developments in recognizing the right to housing under S 7 of the Charter’ [2017] 38 Windsor Rev Legal Soc issues 1
Margot Young, ‘Rights, the Homeless, and Social Change: Reflections on Victoria (City) v. Adams (BCSC)’ (2009) 164 BC Studies 103
Mark Zion, What is a right to shelter in the desert of post-democracy? Tracking homeless narratives from the courtroom to dissensus (LLM Dissertation, University of Victoria 2015).
Terry Skolnik, ‘Rethinking homeless people’s punishments’ [2019] Rev. 22:1 Buff Crim L Rev 73
Marie-Ève Sylvestre, ‘The redistributive potential of Section 7 of the Charter: incorporating socio-economic context in criminal law and in the adjudication of rights’ [2011] 42:3 Ottawa L Rev 389.
Terry Skolnik, ‘Homeless and Unconstitutional Discrimination’ [2019] 15 Journal of Law & Equality 69.
Victoria (City) v. Adams [2008] BCSC 1363 (CanLII) (Adams, BCSC).
Sarah Buhler, ‘Cardboard boxes and invisible fences: homelessness and public space in City Victoria v. Adams’ [2009] 27 Windsor YB Access Just 209.
Sarah Hamill, ‘Private property rights and public responsibility: leaving room for the homeless’ [2011] 30 Windsor Rev Legal issues 91.
Sean Grisdale, ‘Cultivating exclusion: homelessness and the neoliberalization of public space in the ‘City of Gardens’’ (BA Hons Dissertation, University of Victoria 2014)
Thayne Vernon Werdal, ‘When you’re homeless your friends are like your home”: street involved youth friendship in Victoria, Canada’ (MA Dissertation, University of Victoria 2013)
John Franklin Koenig, ‘Spaces of denial and the denial of place: the architectural geography of homelessness in Victoria, BC’ (MA Dissertation, University of Victoria 2007).
Victoria v. Adams [2009] BCCA 563 (CanLII) (Adams, BCCA).
Johnston v Victoria (City) [2010] BCSC 1707 (CanLII) (Johnston, BCSC).
Johnston v Victoria (City) [2010] BCCA 400 (CanLII) (Johnston, BCCA).
Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, ‘And for law: why space cannot be understood without law’ [2018] Sage-Law Culture and the Humanities 1, 8
Irus Braveman, ‘Who’s Afraid of Methodology? Advocating a Methodological Turn in Legal Geography’ in Irus Braveman, Nicholas Blomley, David Delayney, & Alexandre Kedar, eds, The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography (Standford Law Books 2014)
David T. Goldberg, ‘‘Poluting the Body Politic’: Race and Urban Location’, in David Delaney, Richard T. Ford & Nicholas Blomley, eds., The Legal Geographies Reader: Law, Power & Space (Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2001)
Mariana Valverde, “Time Thickens, Takes on Flesh’: Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Law’, in Irus Braveman, Nicholas Blomley, David Delayney, & Alexandre Kedar, eds, The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography (Standford Law Books, 2014).
Nicholas Blomley, ‘From what? To so what?: law and geography in retrospect’ in Jane Holder & Carolyn Harrison, eds, Law and geography. Current legal issues, vol 5 (Oxford University Press 2002) 22
David Delaney, Richard Ford & Nicholas Blomley, ‘Preface: where is law?’ in Nicholas Blomley, David Delaney & Richard Ford, eds, The legal geographies reader: law, power, and space (Blackwell 2001) xvii
Jane Holder & Carolyn Harrison, ‘Connecting law and geography’ in Jane Holder & Carolyn Harrison, eds, Law and geography. Current legal issues, vol 5 (Oxford University Press 2002) 4.
David Delaney, The spatial, the legal and the pragmatics of world-making: nomospheric investigations (Routledge 2010) 9.
Library of Congress Catalogue, ‘You searched: ALL: Legal geography’ [April 21 2021] <https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/search?searchArg=LEGAL+GEOGRAPHY&searchCode=GKEY%5E*&searchType=0&recCount=25&sk=en_US> accessed 21 April 2021.
CBC News, ‘How do Vancouver’s ‘social distancing’ fines work?’ CBC News-British Columbia [25 March 2020] <https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vancouver-social-distancing-penalties-state-of-emergency-1.5508543> accessed 19 December 2020.
David Delaney, ‘Beyond the word: law as a thing of this world’ in Jane Holder & Carolyn Harrison, eds, Law and geography. Current legal issues, vol 5 (Oxford University Press 2002) 67.
Nicholas Blomley, ‘Interpretive practices, the state and the locale’, in Jennifer Wolch & Michael Dear, eds, The power of geography: How territory shapes social life (Unwin Hyman, 1989) 175.
Val Napoleon, ‘Living Together: Gitksan Legal Reasoning as a Foundation for Consent’, in Jeremy Webber & Colin Macleod, eds, Between Consenting Peoples: Political Community and the Meaning of Consent (UBC Press 2010).
Jillian Cavanaugh, ‘Performativity’ in Oxford bibliographies Anthropology [2015] <https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199766567/obo-9780199766567-0114.xml> para 1 accessed 23 January 2021.
Reuben Rose-Redwood & Michael Glass, ‘Preface’ in Michael R. Glass & Reuben Rose-Redwood, eds., Performativity, Politics, and the Production of Social Space (Routledge 2014) xiv.
John Langshaw Austin, How to do things with words: the William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (Oxford University Press 1962).
Judith Butler, Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity (Routledge 1990).
Elena Loizidou, Judith Butler: ethics, law, politics (Routledge 2007) 18.
Rose-Redwood & Glass, ‘Introduction: geographies of performativity’ in Michael Glass & Reuben Rose-Redwood, eds, Performativity, politics, and the production of social space (Routledge 2014) 7.
Nicholas Blomley, ‘Performing property: marking the world’ [2013] 26:1 Can JL & Jur 23, 32.
Judith Butler, Bodies that matter (Routledge 1993) 15.
Michael Dear & Jennifer Wolch, ‘How territory shapes social life’, in Jennifer Wolch & Michael Dear, eds, The power of geography: How territory shapes social life (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989) 3, 5 & 7.
Don Mitchell, ‘The annihilation of space by law: the roots and implications of anti-homeless laws in the United States’ in Nicholas Blomley, David Delaney & Richard Ford, eds, The legal geographies reader: law, power, and space (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001) 14.
Tim Cresswell, In place/Out of place: geography, ideology and transgression (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996) 59, quoted by Mitchell (n 54) 16.
Vancouver Island public Interest Research Group-VIPIRG & Victoria Coalition Against Poverty-VCAP, ‘The people’s plan for Pandora. Research results: statistics and notes from surveys, interviews and focus groups’ (Victoria 2011) <https://vcapvictoria.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/peoples-plan-survey-results-report.pdf> 2 accessed 1 April 2021
Grisdale (n 10) 3; Koenig (n 10) 114 ,119, 122-123, 145, 147
The Corporation of the City of Victoria, by-law No 07-059, Parks Regulation By-law No 07-059, ss 13(1), (2), 14(1), (2), 16(1) (By-law No 07-059) (consolidated on September 22, 2020 up to By-law No 20-102)
The Corporation of the City of Victoria, by-law No 92-84, Streets and Traffic Regulation By-law No 92-84, ss 73(1), 74(1) (By-law No 92-84) (repealed by The Corporation of the City of Victoria, by-law No 09-079, Streets and Traffic Regulation By-law No 09-079 s 123).
City of Vancouver v. Burchill [1932] CanLII 29 (SCC), [1932] SCR 620.
Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v. Canada [1991] CanLII 119 (SCC) [1991] 1 SCR 139.
‘…Public properties are held for the benefit of the public, which includes the homeless.’ Adams, BCSC (n 7) [131].
Greater Victoria Coalition to End Homelessness et al, Everyone counts: 2018 Greater Victoria point-in-time count. A community survey of people experiencing homelessness in Greater Victoria (2018). <https://www.crd.bc.ca/docs/default-source/housing-pdf/housing-planning-and-programs/2018-pit-count---community-report---final---july-19.pdf?sfvrsn=a92ee2ca_2> 14 accessed 19 March 2021; City of Victoria, Victoria housing strategy 2016-2025, phase two: 2019-2022 (2019) <https://www.victoria.ca/assets/Departments/Planning~Development/Community~Planning/Housing~Strategy/The%20Victoria%20Housing%20Strategy_Phase%20Two_FINAL%20Web.pdf> 21 accessed 14 March 2021.
Carla Wilson, ‘Strip crime generators off area-committee’ (June 18, 1994) Times-Colonist, <http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/historical-newspapers/june-18-1994-page-14-76/docview/2264910147/se-2?accountid=14846> accessed 3 March 2021; Koenig (n 10) 153.
Sandra McCulloch, ‘Trouble moves, muscle follows’ (October 12, 1995) Times-Colonist, <http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/newspapers/trouble-moves-muscle-follows-keep-sidewalks-safe/docview/345584534/se-2?accountid=14846> accessed 3 March 2021.
Carla Wilson, ‘Yates street retail trade Victoria business vandalism street people security’ (October 13, 1995) Times-Colonist, <http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/newspapers/yates-street-retail-trade-victoria-business/docview/345581083/se-2?accountid=14846> accessed 3 March 2021. For a thorough description of the events on Yates Street area, see: Koenig (n 10) 158-159.
The Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11, s. 7.
The Corporation of the City of Victoria, by-law No 09-074, Parks Regulation By-law, Amendment By-Law (No.5) (By-law 09-074) (Included within By-law No 07-059, which was consolidated on September 22, 2020 up to Bylaw No 20-102).
By-law No 07-059 (n 59) s. 16(A).
The Corporation of the City of Victoria, by-law No 10-061, Street and Traffic Bylaw, Amendment Bylaw (No. 1) (By-law 10-061).
By-law No 07-059 (n 59) s. 16A. For additional information on the progressive reduction of places open to camping in Victoria, including debates and experiences connected to Beacon Hill Park, see: Grisdale, (n 10) 42-47.
Katie DeRosa, ‘Bylaw officers remove large support tent, showers from Beacon Hill Park’ Times Colonist [November 21, 2020] <https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/bylaw-officers-remove-large-support-tent-showers-from-beacon-hill-park-1.24243306> accessed 16 January 2021
CTV News Vancouver Island, ‘City removes showers, homeless structures from Victoria park’ CTV News Vancouver Island [November 20, 2020] https://vancouverisland.ctvnews.ca/city-removes-showers-homeless-structures-from-victoria-park-1.5198057> accessed 16 January 2021.
Lisa Helps, ‘Showers, community care tent, the city’s role and next steps towards housing – Mayor’s Sunday email’ Lisa Helps – Victoria Mayor Blog [November 8, 2020] <https://lisahelpsvictoria.ca/2020/11/08/showers-community-care-tent-the-citys-role-and-next-steps-towards-housing-mayors-sunday-email-november-8-2020/> accessed 16 January 2021.
Adam van der Zwan, ‘City of Victoria dismantles showers for homeless campers at Beacon Hill Park’ CBC British Columbia [November 21, 2020] <https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/beacon-hill-park-showers-1.5811064> accessed 16 January 2021.
Brishti Basu, ‘Victoria bylaw officers dismantle community tent at Beacon Hill Park’ Victoria Buzz [November 20, 2020] <https://www.victoriabuzz.com/2020/11/victoria-bylaw-officers-police-dismantle-community-care-tent-at-beacon-hill-park/> accessed 16 January 2021.
The Corporation of the City of Victoria, by-law No 20-102, Parks Regulation By-law, Amendment Bylaw (No.10) (By-law 20-102).
City of Victoria, ‘Sheltering in parks’ <https://www.victoria.ca/EN/main/city/bylaw-enforcement/sheltering-in-parks.html> accessed 30 April 2021; The Corporation of the City of Victoria, by-law No 21-049, Parks Regulation By-law, Amendment Bylaw (No.15) (By-law 21-049).
Lisa Helps, ‘Lisa Helps: Don’t let the challenge of homelessness divide us’ Times Colonist [June 20, 2020] <https://www.timescolonist.com/opinion/op-ed/lisa-helps-don-t-let-challenge-of-homelessness-divide-us-1.24156809> accessed 11 April 2021.
For a property-based view of the right not to be excluded, which has not been developed in this paper, see: Crawford Brough Macpherson, ‘The meaning of property’ in C.B. Macpherson ed., Property: mainstream and critical positions (Toronto University Press 1978).